191. in fashion co., ltd.

October 31st, 2009 § 3 Comments

in2-7

Six notes, with accompanying photos, about writing a blog post about the simple, high-quality, and relatively affordable In Fashion Co., Ltd:

1.) It is exceedingly difficult to do a Google search about a brand called “In Fashion.” Consider this problem if you ever start your own fabulous clothing label. The same rule applies to: band names, book titles, etc. — I’m wondering if the title of my novel is going to send people to porno sites.

2.) Increasing the difficulty of this task is the fact that the In Fashion Co. website does not make for easy right-click image saving. Even my CaptureMe! software can’t keep up with the quick-flashing pictures of serious-looking ladies.

3.) In Fashion Co. has the most amazing sewn-in clothing labels I have ever seen, as I can attest to because encountering their store this summer in Taiwan was like happening upon a sartorial gold mine, and I ended up leaving the country with not a few pieces, all of which had a giant tag sewn inside that reads:

In the long history of modern tourism one element is changing
They leave and create to remain the emotion
To create a piece of clothing
Is to create a piece of art
Design is your passion
carry you to success.

My mother, who turned me on to this particular brand, thinks that their labels are the ultimate in poetry. As a non-native English speaker, she asked me (several times) what the clothing labels meant.

4.) I have no idea.

in2-15-1

5.) The best clothes that In Fashion Co. makes aren’t on their website. Still, I find the blue-and-white dress (not pictured) especially inspirational. Is that the semblance of four sleeves I see?

6.) As far as I can tell, In Fashion Co. is only available in Taiwan. List of stores here.

in2-16

in2-22

All photos from http://www.in-store.com.tw/.

xo, mw

190. Etsy store sneak peek/ We want to give you vast & strange domains/ Brenda, I am Spring princess/ Little Women

October 29th, 2009 § 11 Comments

etsy shoesShoes from left to right: booties with cut-outs on the sides, double-strap mary janes, high-heeled oxfords, red suede ankle boots with ties, knee-high buckle boots, vintage Dexter riding boots, blue ankle strap heels. Most of these are only for picture-taking purposes, but the buckle boots are going into the store.

I’ve been very, very slowly organizing my studio into a space for my Etsy store. (There’s nothing there yet, and also is it absurd that my shop is called ‘Unhappy Barber’s Vintage’? I know the answer already.) Not everything in these photos will be for sale (the sailor dress I’m keeping!) But I had to hang up some dresses as quickly as possible because the white walls and bare bulbs in that room were making me feel squeezed from all sides.

Here’s a shy taste/look at some of the vintage dresses I’m selling and a blurry photo of a candy-achy sweet sailor sweater. (I apologize for these terrible photos! It’s my low-rent camera and ne’er do well techniques.)

floral dress badface

floraldressbucklebootstiny flowers babydoll dress + dark brown knee-high boots with buckles for the swashbuckling lady around town

bluedots

blurrybluedotsdress40′s style blue polka dot dress + feather earrings

tiebwdress.JPG_effectedthe first non-blurry photo: 80′s  black cocktail dress with white satin tie-front (I’m wearing it backwards, it’s meant to have a scoop neck front)

Etsystoremoreand back to blurry: nautical sweater, sailor dress, button-up dress

There’s tons more, but I think I’ve already damaged myself from washing fourteen loads of laundry, handwashing a bunch of dresses and sweaters, and ironing for the first time.  My problem is that I have a rickety ironing stand and I was born to trip and drop things. While I was ironing, I kept thinking I was going to drop the iron on my foot and then in fifty years, if I have grandchildren and they ask why my feet are so mangled, instead of having a bad-ass story involving backflips and one-punch victories, I’ll have to tell them about ironing vintage dresses for my etsy store.

I actually have two black and white cocktail dresses for the store (the other is shorter with a white scoop collar) that totally remind me of the episode of 90210 when Brenda and Kelly wear the SAME BLACK AND WHITE DRESS. Egads! But they work it out by yelling at each other and then flanking Donna and her amazing off-the-shoulder big poofy red ruffled dress with CAGE CRINOLINE for a photo. I think the writers of 90210 might have been channeling Meg March when they put Tori Spelling in that dress. Remember the one chapter in Little Women when Meg goes to some fancy ball and then Jo accidentally singes Meg’s hair with a curling iron and then Meg complains about having a plain dress and then her Super Rich Friend loans her a ball gown?

They laced her into a sky-blue dress, which was so tight she could hardly breathe and so low in the neck that modest Meg blushed at herself in the mirror. A set of silver filigree was added, bracelets, necklace, brooch, and even earrings, for Hortense tied them on with a bit of pink silk which did not show. A cluster of tea-rose buds at the bosom and a ruche, reconciled Meg to the display of her pretty white shoulders, and a pair of high-heeled blue silk boots satisfied the last wish of her heart.

If that bit of fashion smut wasn’t enough to turn you feral, here’s a description of the accessories, “A lace handkerchief, a plumy fan, and a bouquet in a silver holder finished her off.”

Wouldn’t it be so fun to show up to a dance party holding a plumy fan?

Some person: It’s too warm in here.

You with the plumy fan: Here, let me fan you with my plumy fan!

Some person: Thanks, you’re a great lady.

You with the plumy fan: (Fanning furiously.)

I remember seriously coveting Meg’s ballgown when I first read Little Women. I had a really lovely illustrated edition that my mom gave to me and sometimes I would skip school and hide in the bathroom (both my parents worked during the day but we shared the house with another family who had an elderly nanny and she sometimes came downstairs to use our kitchen) so I could reread Little Women unfettered. I’m pretty sure flipping through the illustrations of Meg in her ballgown marked the first time I truly appreciated cleavage. When Meg confesses to Jo that she’s been shamefully waltzing around and flirting and flashing her ample bosom at every swinging bachelor, I thought, ‘What’s the big deal?’ I’ll have to scan some pictures when I go back home to New York so you all can appreciate Meg March’s cleavage as well.

Little Women aside, I’ve been spending all my time preparing to open up my Etsy store (and also: translating poems from Chinese into English, dropping huge blocks of cheese on the floor more than three times in one hour, working wretchedly and slowly as a drowning turtle on my writing, throwing out hundreds and hundreds of pages of old manuscripts–sorry trees, sorry world–reading more than 150 pages of student writing–sorry myself–listening to U Ba Than and wishing I had a great skill, like say being astounding at harp, and um, trying to learn 8,000 years of Chinese history–hello three walls of books in the school library, volumes 1-161 of which I’ve read the first ten pages of volume 5.)

I learned a new word today: shambolic. I think it means to be in shambles, which is what I am. I still have to sit down with my Chinese word processor and dictionary and finish translating some poems, and it’s already so late! And get going on a pile of clothes that need ironing. (And also learn how to iron!) My hands are chapped and I’ve been listening to Nico while ironing.

Do you want to stare at Nico’s face while she wonderfully exaggerates all of her syllables? Here she is:

Tomorrow or the next day, I’ll share with you: two white dresses, two dresses I’m lusting after, cross-dressing opera singers in layers and layers of silk sleeves (!!), and maybe maybe maybe my etsy store will be up and running by then.

Love, Jenny

189. Tender buttons

October 26th, 2009 § 5 Comments

IMG_4681use

IMG_4686.JPG_effected5use

IMG_4678

Button-up, pastel-striped blouse (thrift store), yellow skirt (thrift store), lace tie-up, patent oxfords (mind-shatteringly large department store in Shanghai)

I can’t stop thinking about Gertrude Stein and her lectures. Here’s her giving a lecture on  ‘Composition as Explanation’ at Oxford College:

Of course it is beautiful but first all beauty in it is denied and then all the beauty of it is accepted. If every one were not so indolent they would realize that beauty is beauty even when it is irritating and stimulating not only when it is accepted and classic. Of course it is extremely difficult nothing more so than to remember back to its not being beautiful once it has become beautiful. This makes it so much more difficult to realize its beauty when the work is being refused and prevents every one from realizing that they were convinced that beauty was denied, once the work is accepted. Automatically with the acceptance of the time sense comes the recognition of the beauty and once the beauty is accepted the beauty never fails anyone.

Beginning again and again is a natural thing even when there is a series.

Beginning again and again and again explaining composition and time is a natural thing.

It is understood by this time that everything is the same except composition and time, composition and the time of the composition and the time in the compostion.

Everything is the same except composition and as the composition is different and always going to be different everything is not the same. Everything is not the same as the time when of the composition and the time in the composition is different. The composition is different, that is certain.

Somehow, I think that relates to the conversation Meggy & I had on overdressing, notions of beauty and strangeness, and somehow that relates to how this post was going to be about one particular thing but now I’ve lost track of everything and it’s just going to be about a range of particulars.

Today, I met with an Israeli poet/musician/performer for Irish coffees, and she told me that she had to change the way she referred to herself. ‘I’m not really a poet,’ she told me. ‘I’m an articulator.’ I sort of like that, and wonder if I’m more of an articulator than I am a writer. And if there’s a word or term out there for me (& for all those who love clothes) that would be more precise than ‘clotheshorse’ or ‘fashion-lover’ to describe the dreamy totality of my interests in clothes and dress-up?

My new Israeli friend/articulator showed me a video of her students performing bits of Antigone in a mud pit, and then another one of her reciting a monologue from Hamlet to the music of Kraftwerk. She also showed me a series of ‘poems thrown against a wall,’ and of course, I came home and wrote an ode to her. It’s very silly and sycophant-y.

I recently organized my closet (well, half of my closet) by color, something I’ve never ever ever attempted before in my life, and in the process, I found this bright yellow skirt with big plastic buttons down the side. I bought it at my favorite thrift store in San Francisco this summer when I was visiting for Meggy’s wedding. Of course, I had to wear it with some heels to go to class in the spirit of dressing up for no occasion at all.

I’m thinking of Stein again, how she asked a group of journalists in 1934, “Suppose there were no questions what would the answer be?” and then proceeded to answer all of the journalists’ questions in a completely straightforward and direct manner. That Gertrude! When one of the journalists asked her, “Why don’t you write the way you talk?” she replied, “Why don’t you read the way I write?”

To that I add (though I admit the connection to Stein is as flimsy as tracing paper): “Why don’t you dress the way you dream?”

With love,

Jenny

188. FFW HEART-TO-HEART: WEARING A COCKTAIL DRESS TO THE GROCERY STORE, OR, THE IMPLICATIONS OF OVERDRESSING

October 25th, 2009 § 21 Comments

ffwchatFFW Heart-to-Heart is a new feature in which Jenny and I have a, well, heart-to-heart about sartorial and style concerns (and whatever else you might want us to talk about). This week’s topic: overdressing, dressing up, and why we don’t like Halloween.

M: So, Jenny, you mentioned the concept of overdressing, which I often read about in major fashion magazines — as in, DON’T DO IT!

J: Yes! It’s an issue dear to me, and, I suspect, to lots of people who like dressing up and like clothes. I’m thinking specifically of a moment in my life, maybe at some point in high school, when I first had a vague idea of my style and wanting to wear clothes that represented my style everywhere.

M: What was that style, out of curiosity?

J: Well, in high school, it was wearing dresses and skirts every single day, and often wearing my mom’s clothes and her shoes and her accessories to school or to the grocery stores, or to go to the movies, or any place, really, where everyone else was sure to be wearing just jeans and a t-shirt.

I think in high school, I used to wear a lot of my mom’s clothes from her modeling days. There was this one white jumper dress — it was extremely high-waisted, with a cinched corseted-like waist, and I used to wear it to school with these black lace-up boots.

M: Black lace-up boots were definitely a thing. Still are, I guess.

J: And I remember endless comments from my peers: “Hey, so when are the Ice Capades happening?” or, “Are you the Chinese Heidi?” or, “WATCH OUT, THIS GIRL IS ABOUT TO YODEL!” All of this is to say that it’s sometimes awful to stand out, but there’s also something about feeling awful and feeling like a five nostriled freak that has always made me want to continue dressing the way I want, and even to dress more provocatively.

M: I would like to insert here the well-known fact that high school is horrible.

J: It’s the worst!

M: No one ever asked me if I was the Chinese Heidi, but I did get comments on my clothing in high school. I remember in particular one teacher of mine making a snarky comment about the Goodwill (where, incidentally, I didn’t get my clothes, preferring instead to go to a local thrift called the Happy Dragon).

J: Everyone should experience being called the Chinese Heidi, at least once.

M: I’ll get on that.

J: Did you have a style in high school?

M: I did — as you know, I was into riot grrrl at the time, and my style was heavily influenced by that. I wore a lot of homemade t-shirts (including one that said, “Who will be the king and queen of the outcasted teens”) and Bikini Kill shirts. I wasn’t what I would call overdressed — just quirky. It wasn’t until college that I really started getting into clothes. You and I went to different schools for the first two years of undergrad, but I seem to recall Stanford having the same pajama syndrome that Yale did.

J: Absolutely — at Stanford, simply wearing a button-down shirt and jeans felt like an act of overdressing sometimes. How have you negotiated this — wearing clothes you want to, say, class, or a social gathering, where you know most people will be dressed very casually, and more often than not, dressed very differently from you? And have you ever purposefully tried to dress down for those reasons? How would you dress for a party, for example — let’s say a WRITERS’ party – hi blog!

M: I don’t tend to dress down unless I feel like I’m going to be truly offensive by dressing up (for example, when I go to volunteer). I hate wearing t-shirts. I was just complaining to Chris yesterday about how I have so many t-shirts. As far as parties go – I have to say that I tend to dress up for parties. I mean, I wear cocktail dresses to the grocery store; it’s inevitable that I’ll dress up for a party. Do you ever get the feeling that people think you’re trying to show off, just because you’re dressed up?

J: Yes! That’s my main fear. I worry other people, men and women, will think that I’m trying to stand out and trying to lord my femininity over everyone else. It doesn’t bother me if I’m the only person in a nice dress at a party, but if someone were to say, “Hey, are you wearing LIPSTICK,” which has happened to me on the five separate occasions in my life when I’ve worn lipstick, then I start to worry obsessively that everyone in the room is thinking that I spent hours getting ready just so I could be the best looking person in the room.

M: Right. A secret to my sartorial life, by the way, is that I actually get dressed very quickly. But the act of looking “nice,” or “dressing up,” definitely tends to convey narcissism in some circles.

J: Same with me — I dress super quickly. I worry, too, about the implications of dressing feminine (and I so hesitate to use that word without interrogation but I will!), especially in situations where my way of femininity in dress might be interpreted wrongly, i.e., she must be pretty shallow!

M: How do you deal with that?

J: I think I deal with that by making a scatological joke right off the bat. Kidding again, I think.

M: Ah, so overdressing then equates not only narcissism and impoliteness, but shallowness, as well. Or superficiality.

J: What about you, Meggy? Do you feel like your way of dressing allows others to make imprecise or altogether wrong perceptions about you? Does it matter to you?

M: For the most part, I think people are pretty positive about the fact that I dress up more often than not. At the very least, it gives them something to look at. As far as imprecise or wrong perceptions, I think class can be easily implicated by dressing up — even if this dress or that coat was actually from Goodwill, and cost less than $20. I’m not saying that I’m poor, either; I’m just saying that clothing, and especially dressing up, is a way that people tend to judge class.

J: That’s so incredibly true.

M: I mentioned this in my last post, but this happens a lot when I wear my giant fake fur coat. It looks real, and it’s kind of ridiculous, so it appears as though I spent, like, a thousand dollars on it.

J: My mom, in the 90′s, bought a fake fur coat from Express for $8, and she got so tired of her co-workers saying, “Wow! Did you win the lottery?” that she ended up throwing it in a dumpster one night!

M: Wow. I think that this is also why people who dress up tend to minimize compliments. At least, I do.

J: I’ve been watching some old(ish) movies lately: Rosemary’s Baby, and Buster Keaton films, and right now, I’m watching The Apartment, and, like most fashion bloggers I’d guess, I’m completely enamored with the way women dress in these movies (while being somewhat aware of the fantasy of Hollywood films). I think a major reason why so many fashion bloggers and clothes-lovers have so much love for vintage and past decades is due to some nostalgic idea that back then, people dressed up for cocktails and dinner parties. But then I wonder: would I still take as much pleasure in dressing up in skirts and dresses if everyone did it? Or do I derive pleasure from feeling exceptional in a way?

M: I know what you mean (and I also wanted all of Mia Farrow’s clothes in Rosemary’s Baby). For example, if we all lived in a world like the one in “Mad Men,” would we still derive pleasure from putting curlers in our hair every night and wearing cute outfits? Part of that, maybe, is this issue of agency — the CHOICE to dress up. I think that if I had to, I’d hate it. Maybe it’s just another, post-teenaged form of rebellion.

J: I agree completely. I think rebellion is very much part of the pleasure of dressing up. And also fantasy — the fantasy of dress-up! Performing your fantasy self through your choice of dress is really lovely.

M: Right — all sorts of fantasy, not just the “princess” dress-up… which might be why I don’t particularly like Halloween. I feel like Halloween all the time — Halloween as sanctified overdressing.

J: Right, and part of what’s repulsive about Halloween to me is that you’re expected to dress up that night. And also that somehow, Halloween, like most opportunities to dress up in America, has somehow just become completely conflated with an opportunity to dress ‘sexy’ in a fairly expected, unsurprising sort of way.

M: Totally. Maybe I’ll wear a t-shirt and jeans for Halloween.

J: You touched on this in your post about how to dress for teaching, but living in a college town is exciting, deadening, and sometimes scary (all at once!) for someone who loves dressing up. It’s exciting because of that aspect of rebellion (being the only person not wearing a sweatshirt and Uggs between the hours of 9 am and 5 pm). Deadening for that same exact reason!

M: And yet there are some really creative dressers on college campuses. I have one student like that.

J: Me too! By the way, I went to my first tailgate two weekends ago. It was homecoming. Actually, I think it was Iowa versus Michigan? And I was so terrified the entire time. There were more than seventy thousand people in the street. I saw two punkers; other than that, every single person I saw was in black and gold. I thought I had dressed innocuously in my brown wool coat and my grey tights and boots, but I had never felt more conspicuous in my life! If you took away the context of the football game, it would have just been a mob scene–the glut of uniformed people, the aggression, the harassment. Definitely not a place for sartorial deviation. Or maybe, it’s exactly the place for it (if you are brave!)

So, in conclusion, dress up whenever you feel like, except not on homecoming weekend.

M: Here, here.

iowatailgatingrightsize

Black and yellow tailgate days (via the forum goazcats.com)

rosemaryyellow

We’d rather have white and yellow shift dress days around the house instead.

rosemaryblue

Oh! If we owned a long sleeved blue dress with a rounded collar and tiny, tiny flowers, we’d find a way to wear it everywhere.

(screencaps of Rosemary’s Baby from thefashionspot.com)

187. autumn, tenderness

October 24th, 2009 § 3 Comments

DSC01749 (1).jpg_effected

Photo 130.jpg_effected

Sea Pony fascinator, DIY crystal chandelier necklace, London Times dress

As Jenny indicated by her beautiful Iowa-autumn photograph, the leaves, they are a-turnin’ in our neck of the woods (i.e., the Midwest).

I’m working double-time on my novel/thesis at present, and so my mind is, at present, absorbed in issues of tenderness and desire and obsession, which are all obviously universal feelings — though they may be exaggerated in my (immigrant Gothic) novel. Yesterday I worked on trying to make a particular sex scene twice as long as it previously was. I won’t get into details, but the protagonist finally becomes intimate with the object of his obsession, and in workshop people expressed their concern that my first draft of the scene was too short, especially given the level of his obsession. So being absorbed in that world, the semi-coercive nature of the scene, the toxic/pathetic world of this protagonist’s head (as one of my classmates said, “he’s a baaaaad boy”), and doing all of this while being holed up in my dark, dark apartment makes for some, uh, weird living.

One thing that’s really been helping me lately is finally getting around to reading Anna Karenina, which Hanna prescribed to me as the cure for my primary writerly ailment (my tendency to be overly perfunctory/minimalist). And so now I think I’m getting more into issues of breadth and depth. Good stuff.

I’m off to have a working brunch now with Miriam. We’re going to discuss her novel and eat brunch together — hopefully an auspicious beginning to the day…

Have a beautiful Saturday –

xo, mw

186. my unpatriotic coat

October 23rd, 2009 § 1 Comment

20080513130949_3g11069u500

poster from WWI (Vintagraph)

While browsing Vintagraph, an amazing collection of old posters and illustrations for sale, I came across this World War I poster about fashion and patriotism. So right now would be the ultimate time to dress with the least extravagance possible. Not only are we in war time, but we’ve got that whole recession thing going on; what better time to go around in sack-cloths and uniforms? In the meantime, it’s gotten downright cold in Ann Arbor, and I’m finding myself donning the most “extravagant” piece of clothing I own: a giant, white, faux-fur coat that I bought off of Etsy a year or two ago. It’s not the most expensive coat I own, but it certainly makes me look a little bit ridiculous (as in, I look like the Abominable Snowman). I’ve gotten comments on the street about how I must be Super Rich to wear such a luxe-looking piece of clothing, which makes me a little uncomfortable; but then again, didn’t I buy this coat because it’s so ridiculous, and also incredibly warm?

Everything’s so brilliantly colored right now in Michigan, but the big storm today killed off the brightness, and soaked everything till it looked positively dull. So I’m wearing my unpatriotic coat tonight to my friend Katie’s reading at the art museum, and I might as well hold my head up high.

xo, mw

Where Am I?

You are currently viewing the archives for October, 2009 at Fashion for Writers.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers