324. Aside from the ethics of blogging, what about the ontology of the (blogger’s) self, and how does our culture allow us to get away with so much conformity? (and on a darker note: you can ask us anything you want)
May 30th, 2010 § 14 Comments
The same way we’ve taught them [our kids] that a ‘self’ is just something you have. No wonder they cannot appreciate the central Kafka joke–that the horrific struggle to establish a human self results in a self whose humanity is inseparable from that horrific struggle. That our endless and impossible journey toward home is our home. It’s hard to put into words, on the blackboard, believe me. You can’t tell them that maybe it’s good they don’t get Kafka.”
- The always erudite and surprisingly compassionate David Foster Wallace on trying to explain Kafka’s ‘humor’ to high school students.
Did I mention that since forever, I’ve been working on a blog post about Shanghai and another one on Lena Horne and anger and how annoying it is to see women dismiss other women as ‘just jealous,’ or even to see women dismiss their own feelings as just unacceptable jealousy, and also an essay not for this blog about pre-pubescent sexuality and modeling nude and feeling confused because sometimes it’s empowering to do things that set feminism back a hundred years (maybe the reason why there is an uneasy and sometimes combative relationship between feminism, sexuality, sex, and the adult film industry?) like, for example, my simultaneous desire to be seen as cute and sweet and pure and loving and feminine and kind and adorable and attractive and appealing and even non-threatening, while also desiring to be an assertive, scary, radical, militant–wait, no–unapologetically radical, militant, fearless, and proud feminist. Does that make sense?
I sense there’s a lot of twittering (although I mean the audible murmurs here and there of the virtual kind, I suppose I also mean ‘twittering’ or ‘tweeting’ as a patented verb owned by Twitter corporation) about some blogs getting stale because they seem more and more like advertisement outlets for online retailers like Modcloth, or wherever the blogger gets her ‘courtesy of’ items from. I don’t really have anything compelling to add to this discussion, except I do want to repost a question Minh-ha posed in her series of blog posts on Threadbared devoted to the value (and costs) of fashion blogging. I really appreciate that Minh-ha asks us to:
REIMAGINE VALUE OUTSIDE OF CAPITALISM. Are there other ways to valorize quality when it comes to blogs?
I think maybe one reason the discussions around bloggers who frequently feature c/o items seemed stale to me from the minute it began is that most of the debate is still firmly rooted in the assumptions and structures of capitalism. Either it’s ‘Oh, it’s annoying to see too many c/o items, but I’m probably jealous and I would take free shit too if someone offered it to me,’ or ‘It’s okay to get free shit as long the blogger still remains true to herself and her style!’ Nevermind the vastly disproportionate trade in ‘value’ when a company like Modcloth sends a free dress to a blogger. Modcloth sacrifices what? Fifty dollars to give away a free dress? And in return, Modcloth receives a huge boost in sales and traffic to their site. How can we critique this exchange without understanding the inequality in the exchange itself, which is an inequality inherent in the very tenets of capitalism, which is inherent in any situation where there’s an exchange between a corporation and an individual.
I’m not sure I’m terribly interested in where I fit in the odious structures that govern these transactions, exchanges, and gifts, if you will. I am, however, interested in this repeatedly raised notion of a ‘self,’ sometimes more crudely termed as being ‘true to myself/oneself/herself’ or sometimes described as having a ‘distinct voice.’ Which brings me back to David Foster Wallace again, and Kafka, and the essential Kafka joke, as DFW describes it, is “that the horrific struggle to establish a human self results in a self whose humanity is inseparable from that horrific struggle.”
I appreciate that DFW adds, ‘maybe it’s good they don’t get Kafka.’ For a lot of people, and here I guess I’m thinking specifically about bloggers, maybe it’s achingly unpleasant to consider ‘the horrific struggle for a self,’ or to consider maybe that struggle was never undertaken in the first place, even in the humble beginnings of a blog, pre sponsorships and internet fame. Or maybe we need to be protective of that self, because maybe we can’t and won’t allow for that horrific struggle to be visible, to be observed or easily detected by others, and maybe in that way, fashion blogs were primed from the beginning to be nothing more than capitalistic, advertising vehicles. And if that’s true, then it’s all the more important to try to resist and subvert, to try and figure out if there are ways to assess the value of our work outside of capitalism. And all the more important to be in on Kafka’s joke, no?




By the way, this little ruffled chambray skirt I bought last year fell on my head as I was trying to navigate my frightening closet, and I put it on to discover that it’s still too short, and next summer, it’ll probably be even more too short, and the summer after that, I’ll have to chuck it and submit to hegemonic claims on indecency and maturity. I was testing out my parents’ old Olympus ED 35-180 film SLR from over a decade ago. In the last photo, I’m trying to take a photo of an impressive spiderweb. There’s a booty shot in there somewhere, which only proves I can’t get away with this skirt, but then again somehow the US government and BP have ‘gotten away’ with allowing 19,000 barrels of oil to spill into the Gulf daily, for over a month now, with no end in sight despite repeated warnings that this may very well be the worst oil spill in American history and could have damaging, long-term effects on the climate and our environment, so um, I get so show as much booty as I want.
PS: I think we may have gained a few more readers (or maybe I’m deluded?) and we just wanted to say hi, new readers! We’d love to hear from you and invite any of our readers to ask us anything at all in the comments (or email us.) I also made a formspring account for myself (username: unhappybarber, of course!) Why? I don’t know. You can ask me anything there. It can be nice or nasty, polite or intrusive. We’ll answer your questions in a future post–maybe even a video post.
Love, Jenny
323. q&a
May 28th, 2010 § 3 Comments
This is a post of questions and answers, and questions that request answers, and questions about questions that you might have that request answers.
Why does eating a bowl of homemade granola, the best granola I have ever eaten, eaten with a drizzling of almond milk, create a soporific effect so strong that two cups of coffee does not even make a dent? And what will I do if this happens at a job, when I am not permitted to take an hour-long nap to counteract said soporific effects of granola? Or is this pointless, because I will probably never eat that granola again?
Was the necklace in the photograph above a collar or a necklace or both, and what decade is it from?
Is 148 pages a reasonable amount to write in approximately a year, and if so, how long will it take for me to finish this novel? Was 48 pages a reasonable amount to write in the month that I was here? How many more pages will I write here, before I go back to San Francisco on Monday? Will I be able to write on the plane, or will the person in front of me recline his or her seat, therefore forcing my MacBook into my lap, and will I look at the person next to me and roll my eyes, as I usually do?
Are you excited that Jenny is coming to San Francisco in June, although not as excited as I am, and what sorts of ridiculous and absurd photographs would you like for us to take together, or should we just gorge ourselves on Thai food and go dancing like we used to, and forget about blog things for however long she’s here?
What makes The Discomfort Zone an interesting, or non-interesting, memoir?
and
Will someone who knows CSS solve a few minor coding issues for us, like putting comment links on the front page? We will pay $40.
Would you like to ask us some questions? Will you please submit some questions in the comments below, so that we can answer them in a future post? (Sample questions: What is your favorite celebrity hairdo? What is your least favorite literary journal? Is n+1 to be loved or reviled? Have you worked retail?)
xo,
321. sad sack
May 25th, 2010 § 3 Comments
Dress: Sally Jane Vintage, shoes: vintage bow heels, headphones: UO
I am mired in a moment of extreme materialistic greed, and I hope that by posting the subject of said materialistic greed, I will be purged of the desire to acquire said thing and will not be sad that it is too expensive to be any sort of realistic birthday present. The object in question is a JAS MB Rucksack, “leather,” “fully lined,” and “handmade in England.” Attached to this sad sack is a price tag of $560. I have combed my Totokaelo emails for a hint of a coupon code or discount, to no avail. The rucksack is out of reach.
In an attempt to satisfy my desire for a backpack both classy enough for my new fashion-mag gig, as well as durable enough to handle my habit of stuffing my bags with a laptop, camera and books, Chris has been sending me email upon email of other leather backpacks. I seem to be suffering from rucksack-blindness, however, and am beginning to think that I would rather just have a nice, quiet dinner, plenty of hugs, and a copy of Rainbow Stories.
xo,







































